<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugh Nibley: A Consecrated Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Keller</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>Sorry Steve. My comment editor has some weird glitches. If you are still interested see:

http://www.fairwiki.org/index.php/Hugh_Nibley:Footnotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Steve. My comment editor has some weird glitches. If you are still interested see:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fairwiki.org/index.php/Hugh_Nibley:Footnotes" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairwiki.org/index.php/Hugh_Nibley:Footnotes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>Dave,
That link isn&#039;t working for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
That link isn&#8217;t working for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Keller</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/#comment-2113</guid>
		<description>Matt,

I am thrilled to have your comments on this little site. I think you are spot on in your initial description of Hugh Nibley and his influence on subsequent Mormon scholars. &lt;em&gt;Offenders for a Word&lt;/em&gt; is a classic book that has never gotten a serious review, so I am glad to see that take such a challenge in your new book. By the way, I first learned about your book when you brought it to the attention of FAIR. Some of your chapters look interesting. I might be persuaded to do a mini-review if I could get my hands on a free copy.

I have addressed Nibley\&#039;s footnotes in a subsequent blog entry. May I suggest that Martha Beck\&#039;s second hand anecdote about meeting a mysterious man in tweed about her father\&#039;s footnotes is less credible compared to critiques in academic publications. For those interested, the newly created FAIR Wiki &lt;a rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot; href=\&quot;http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/%5C%22%5C%22\&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;page&lt;/a&gt; contains a good summary of points made by Nibley\&#039;s most vociferous in-house critics.

While I admit that LDS scholars perform a valuable service in honestly articulating the Mormon religion and defending it from uncharitable attacks, ultimately choosing to adhere to a particular religion is a matter of faith and prayer. An over-reliance on current winds of scholarship seems to me to be akin to putting one\&#039;s faith in the arm of the flesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>I am thrilled to have your comments on this little site. I think you are spot on in your initial description of Hugh Nibley and his influence on subsequent Mormon scholars. <em>Offenders for a Word</em> is a classic book that has never gotten a serious review, so I am glad to see that take such a challenge in your new book. By the way, I first learned about your book when you brought it to the attention of FAIR. Some of your chapters look interesting. I might be persuaded to do a mini-review if I could get my hands on a free copy.</p>
<p>I have addressed Nibley\&#8217;s footnotes in a subsequent blog entry. May I suggest that Martha Beck\&#8217;s second hand anecdote about meeting a mysterious man in tweed about her father\&#8217;s footnotes is less credible compared to critiques in academic publications. For those interested, the newly created FAIR Wiki <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/%5C%22%5C%22\" rel="nofollow">page</a> contains a good summary of points made by Nibley\&#8217;s most vociferous in-house critics.</p>
<p>While I admit that LDS scholars perform a valuable service in honestly articulating the Mormon religion and defending it from uncharitable attacks, ultimately choosing to adhere to a particular religion is a matter of faith and prayer. An over-reliance on current winds of scholarship seems to me to be akin to putting one\&#8217;s faith in the arm of the flesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Paulson</title>
		<link>http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Paulson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormonandcatholic.org/hugh-nibley-a-consecrated-life/#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>Hugh Nibley ushered in a new brand of intellectual LDS scholarship that brings a serious challenge to the critics of Mormonism. In serveral of writings he attempts to document some interesting parallels between early Christianity and Mormonism. Daniel Peterson and Stephen Ricks have continued this same reasoning in their book &quot;Offenders for a Word&quot; (FARMS 1998). However, these LDS scholars neglect to analyze the theology of the writers they cite. See my book &quot;Breaking the Mormon Code&quot; (WingSpan 2006). 

Even Martha Beck, the daughter of Hugh Nibley, claimed that portions of his research was invented. See her book, &quot;Leaving the Saints&quot; (Crown, 2005). Why should I believe in Mormonism if I cannot believe the scholars that promote this religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Nibley ushered in a new brand of intellectual LDS scholarship that brings a serious challenge to the critics of Mormonism. In serveral of writings he attempts to document some interesting parallels between early Christianity and Mormonism. Daniel Peterson and Stephen Ricks have continued this same reasoning in their book &#8220;Offenders for a Word&#8221; (FARMS 1998). However, these LDS scholars neglect to analyze the theology of the writers they cite. See my book &#8220;Breaking the Mormon Code&#8221; (WingSpan 2006). </p>
<p>Even Martha Beck, the daughter of Hugh Nibley, claimed that portions of his research was invented. See her book, &#8220;Leaving the Saints&#8221; (Crown, 2005). Why should I believe in Mormonism if I cannot believe the scholars that promote this religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
